Labels:text | screenshot | font | number | document | menu OCR: OBJECT OPTIONS Companies Without Companies Interested Companies Interested a Special Interest in Object Technology In Adopting Object Technology Gradually in Adopting Object Technology ASAP Languages Cobol C++, 00 Cobol Smalltalk Operating Systems, DOS> Windows; Interface Windows 4.0/NT; NextStep; Taligent; Networks ,.. Builders; RPC C/5 Networks OLE1>OLE2; OS/2, SOM Corba (SOM) Client/Server Application VisualBasic; PowerBuilder; SQL Windows, ObjectPro VisualAge, PARTS Workbench, Development Conventional 4GLs Object Studio, VisualWorks Tools :: Case Tools, Conventional Case 00-enhanced Case Tools; OO Case Tools; Methodologies : Repositories Tools; Structured OO Methodologies OO Methodologies Methodologies (e.g ., Martin/Odell) (e.g ., Wirfs-Brock, Objectory) Class Libraries, OLE Components C++ Class Libraries for Business Object Libraries; Components Programming Component Libraries; „Legacy Code Wrapped Legacy Apps Databases Relational DBS RDBs with OO Front Ends OO DBS SOURCE: HARMON ASSOCIATES Speaking Different Languages. Corporate attitude affects the way OO languages find use. Smalltalk, with its pure OO roots, is the likely choice of those diving into objects quickly. C++ and OO Cobol, both based on popular languages, are the typical tools of the gradual adopter.
